United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 20-5342 September Term, 2020
Filed On: March 3, 2021
United States of America,
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Tatel and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.
34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 9,
2020, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint as frivolous. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Decatur Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia,
478 F.3d 360
363 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over “obviously
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
Daniel J. Reidy